Hi AJ,
Having been 'sprung' I can understand if you are feeling aggrieved but before you respond you should perhaps look to the evidence: In the first place you cannot refute the evidence because I am looking at what you have written here:
HI Majin,
It is called Nagashizuki, or Tobikomi Nagashizuki.
and in the second place at what you have posted on youtube here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... nRaNXZtTcM
In both cases you refer to the nagashizuki technique shown in the video as Tobikomi Nagashizuki, which is wrong.
David's confusion is evident because he goes on to apologise for an error that he did not make.
Now would be a good time to apologise for the error.
As for this:
I can say online that I'm quite disappointed with your style of formulating messages.
If you are still aggrieved then perhaps further plagiarism is not for you any longer plus a keener eye for editing any differences between fact and fiction might be a better practice in the future.
oneya.
WadoAJ wrote:Dear Oneya,
I probably regret this post in the future, but for now I feel I have to reply, although I do not have to.
oneya wrote:
AJ is confusing you even more
Really? Did Majin tell you this? I guess that you are guessing. It does not look like it is based on a fact.
oneya wrote:
AJ is quite wrong, they are not the same thing at all.
I never said they are the same thing.
I can say online that I'm quite disappointed with your style of formulating messages.
I hope you will enjoy your karate.
Best regards, AJ